Moderation of the forum

[jetdoc]

It struck me as a mundane, nebulas post promoting self importance;o)

[RALPHCUSENS]

We are on the same page, Ralph.

Our discussions have been positive and reassuring. Thank you for your attention.
:up:

Is this a JOKE? Here is a guy that is proably the most guilty of name calling and putting people down on the site. But when something comes out about him, which I have not seen him deny yet, then he has discussions with Ralph. What a JOKE....

Just to clarify the above, I did NOT have a discussion with anyone, I simply replied to two PMs that I received, I will not post what the content of his PM was, but below are the two responses that I made by PM

Thanks for the PM Mark, Just to let know that I do not post and as far as I can remember, never have posted under Admin.

I must also make it clear that several threads that that have been locked recently, IMHO, should have been locked sooner, before they got out of hand. I will try to spend more time on line to try to ensure that threads do not get out of hand.

It does need to be a particular "secret admin" to verify it was not you who made the report, IT WASN'T!
Don't suppose we can drop it now?????

And a reply to another member's PM

I can not be on line all the time, I can assure you that I will moderate without fear or favour

I hope that clarifies that.

[thaimac]

It struck me as a mundane, nebulas post promoting self importance;o)

Yes, jetdoc, I can agree with that as he is always promoting that. However I would not be suprised if he is the reason for this thread and had to get in a little dig for the double standard.

[3lll3]

Is this a JOKE? Here is a guy that is proably the most guilty of name calling and putting people down on the site. But when something comes out about him, which I have not seen him deny yet, then he has discussions with Ralph. What a JOKE....

You're biting off more than you can chew, my dear friend. There were no discussions about me, which is why there was no denial. I explained that to your dear friend, JK, when he made the same erroneous claim regarding denial.

You were asked many, many days ago to provide all of your evidence. You chose to ignore it. Now you return to make the same claims and add to it.

[3lll3]

It struck me as a mundane, nebulas post promoting self importance;o)

Yes, jetdoc, I can agree with that as he is always promoting that. However I would not be suprised if he is the reason for this thread and had to get in a little dig for the double standard.

Once again, biting off more than you can chew.

Ralph has already stated that I was not the one complaining about the thread or the statements of libel and slander. I have no reason to complain about something that is not about me. Get it?

But here you are trying to make this thread about me ... again. Aren't you tired of that? :* :inlove:

[Juan kossoff]

It struck me as a mundane, nebulas post promoting self importance;o)

Yes, jetdoc, I can agree with that as he is always promoting that. However I would not be suprised if he is the reason for this thread and had to get in a little dig for the double standard.

Agree. And Thaimac I understood the posts and claims exactly the same as you and have had several email confirms to the same.

[3lll3]

Well, I'll leave the knitting circle to their gossip. You guys have at it.

[merchant seaman]

I read that thread and it wasn't 3III3 that made any accusations that could be deemd to be slander or libel. Nor where any made towards him. So would seem very unlikely he would threaten with legal action.

[(B) Banger]

HMMMMM! Sometime less said the better.

[Juan kossoff]

Well seems to be working ++)(* .
I have a question for the mods, if a member has been banned is he or she allowed back under another user name/names ?